No on Tacoma Measure 1

No on Tacoma Measure 1: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.205, .235, .240 & .270 by failing to timely & accurately register as a political committee & report contributions (including earmarked and/or in-kind) & expenditures. (EY ’23; Oct ’23)

Case Details

Case Number

143846

Respondent

No on Tacoma Measure 1

Complainant

Tacoma for All

Date Opened

October 18, 2023

Case Status

Case Closed with Written Warning

PDC staff found evidence of minor violation and warned respondent.

Learn More

Area(s) of Law*

  • RCW 29B.25.020/42.17A.205
  • RCW 29B.25.090/42.17A.235
  • RCW 29B.25.100/42.17A.240
  • RCW 29B.25.150/42.17A.270

*On January 1, 2026, RCW 42.17A was recodified to RCW 29B

Subscribe for Updates


{{statusMessage}}

To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button. You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.


An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{ email }}.

If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail filters.

Send again

{{statusMessage}}

Description

The complaint alleged that No on Tacoma Measure 1, a local ballot measure committee, may have violated RCW 42.17A.205, .235, .240 & .270 in 2023 by failing to timely register as a political committee, and timely report 1) contributions received from National Association of Realtors and Washington Realtors; 2) in-kind contribution(s) of staff time from Tacoma-Pierce County Association of Realtors; and 3) earmarked contributions from Tacoma-Pierce County Association of Realtors.

Based on the attached findings, the resolution in PDC Case 143847, and pursuant to WAC 390-37-060(1)(d), No on Tacoma Measure 1 (the “Respondent”) received a formal written warning concerning their failure to 1) timely and accurately disclose all pledges; and 2) timely disclose Last-Minute Contributions received prior to an election. PDC staff expect the Respondent to timely disclose all pledges and Last-Minute Contributions in the future. The Commission will consider this formal written warning in deciding on further Commission action if there are future violations of PDC laws or rules.

PDC staff is also reminded the Respondent about the importance of 1) providing sufficient expenditure details on C-4 reports including, but not limited to, vendor address, the number of mailers and ads, where they appeared, and when; and 2) timely amending C-4 reports within 21 days of original reports, whenever possible. PDC staff expect that, in the future, the Respondent will include such details on, and timely amend, C-4 reports in accordance with PDC laws, rules, and guidance. 

For the reasons indicated in the attached letter, the allegation concerning earmarked contributions was dismissed. 

Based on this information, the PDC has dismissed this matter in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1).

Penalties

None