Jonathan Babcock : Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.235, .240 and .320 for failure to accurately report contributions and expenditures and include sponsor address on website and pollical advertising. (EY25 JUL25)

The Respondent is a first-time candidate. It appears that the lack of description detail and subvendor information for in-kind contributions made by the Campaign Treasurer, and the incomplete sponsor identification on the campaign’s political advertisements, were due to the lack of knowledge and experience of the candidate and treasurer. Staff found no evidence that the details about in-kind contributions made or the identity of the sponsor of political advertisement was done purposely to conceal this information from the public.

Based on our findings, staff has determined that, in this instance, any violation that may have occurred was minor and has been cured. After consideration of the circumstances, further proceedings would not serve the purpose of the Fair Campaign Practices Act. Under WAC 390-37- 060, the executive director, at any time prior to consideration by the commission, may dismiss a complaint which on its face, or as shown by investigation, provides reason to believe that a violation has occurred, but also shows that the respondent is in substantial compliance with the relevant statutes or rules, or shows that formal enforcement action is not warranted.

Pursuant to WAC 390-37-060(1)(d), however, Jonathan Babcock is receiving a formal written warning concerning failure to timely and accurately disclose details regarding contributions and expenditures, and failure to include complete sponsor ID on political advertisement. The formal written warning includes staff’s expectation that the Respondent timely and accurately file all future required reports of contributions and expenditures, and ensures future political advertisements include any required sponsor ID. The Commission will consider this formal written warning in deciding on further Commission action if there are future violations of PDC laws or rules.

Based on this information, the PDC has dismissed this matter in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1).